Tidemark by Quelris

I check how your SaaS shows up in search and AI answers, then write the page it’s missing.

$400

Fixed price for one written diagnosis and one comparison page, delivered as a pull request you can merge. For small SaaS with English speaking buyers and nobody doing SEO full time. I can’t promise rankings or traffic.

Apply for a diagnosis

The page, on my own SaaS

Qriple is my own product. This comparison page went out as a pull request, the same deliverable you’d get. It quotes MultipleChat’s public pages, opened on 12 October 2026, and says where MultipleChat fits better.

qriple.app/vs/multiplechat

Pull request #413: Add /vs/multiplechat comparison page

Merged 12 October 2026. 8 files, +396 −5.

  • vs/multiplechat/page.tsx+241
  • vs/multiplechat/__tests__/page.test.tsx+137
  • compare/page.tsx+10 −3
  • __tests__/mechanismClaims.test.tsx+3 −1
  • metadata-routes.test.ts+2 −1
  • sitemap.ts+1
  • vs/chathub/page.tsx+1
  • vs/talkory/page.tsx+1

This shows the format of the work. I’m not using Qriple’s rankings or traffic as proof of anything.

What I found on three public sites

Each teardown lists the evidence, the source URLs, and what I couldn’t measure. Read one before you decide.

  1. DocumensoAll 27 core pages share one title, and no page compares Documenso with DocuSign, the rival named in that title.Checked 2 November 2026
  2. Cal.comOn all 171 workflow pages, seven of the ten “Talk to sales” links in the HTML go to the homepage.Checked 2 November 2026
  3. CannyThe demo page is titled only “Canny” and has no description. 994 tag pages sit in the sitemap, and most sampled ones link to a single post.Checked 2 November 2026

These three sites run on Framer, so they fall outside this offer, which needs a marketing site in Git. They are examples of the diagnosis, not clients or prospects, and none of them asked for or reviewed this work.

What you get

The diagnosis

A written report with the evidence next to every claim.

  • Which pages can be crawled and indexed, and what stops the rest. I crawl your public site and read Search Console if you grant read only access.
  • What ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews say to the same buyer questions, each asked twice in a fresh session, with the sources they cite.
  • Pricing, plan names and limits on your site that no longer match your product.
  • What to fix, what to write and what to leave alone, in order. Anything I couldn’t measure is marked unknown.

One comparison page

The comparison the diagnosis ranks highest, written so a buyer can decide from it.

  • Every claim about you or a competitor has a source URL and a date. You approve your own product facts first.
  • It arrives as a pull request on your marketing site repo, with internal links and a sitemap entry. You merge it. I never touch production.
  • After you merge, I confirm the URL loads, can be indexed, is in your sitemap and matches what you approved, and send you the result in writing.

How it goes

  1. You apply with your site and what you want to rank for. I reply within 2 business days and say so if it’s not a fit. If it is, you get the scope and a delivery date in writing before you pay.
  2. You get the report and the page I recommend. You can challenge any finding, because you can see what it rests on.
  3. You review the pull request and merge when you’re convinced. I check the live page and tell you what passed, what didn’t and what is still unknown.

What I can’t promise

Google and the AI companies decide search results and AI answers. I don’t promise rankings, traffic, signups, revenue, citations in AI answers, or indexing by any date. I do promise the report and page as scoped, a traceable source for every claim, and nothing live without your approval.

Who this is for

A good fit

  • A SaaS, B2B or B2C, with a public pricing page and competitors your buyers compare you against.
  • A marketing site in Git, on Next.js, Astro or similar.
  • Someone who can review a pull request within a week.

Not a fit

  • Your site lives only in a CMS with no code access. That includes Webflow, Framer and most WordPress sites.
  • You sell content, services or physical goods.
  • You need rankings or traffic guaranteed in writing.

Questions

Who does the work?

I do. I’m Noel Kim, and Tidemark is a one-person service by Quelris.

Can you show client results?

No. I have no client results to publish yet. Judge the teardowns and the Qriple page above.

Why a comparison page?

Buyers ask how you compare before they choose. Without your own page, that answer comes from whoever else wrote one, often a competitor.

What access do you need?

Your public site is enough to start. Without read only Search Console access, those items are marked unknown. To ship the page I need to open a pull request on your site repo.

What if I don’t merge the page?

That’s your call, and the pull request stays yours to use. I run the live check only after a merge.

Do you use AI to do this?

Yes, for gathering and drafting. I check every claim before it reaches you.

Is this a subscription?

No. You pay once, and the report and the page are yours to keep.

Apply for a diagnosis

Applying costs nothing. I reply within 2 business days.

A few words is enough.

I use these details only to review your application and reply. See the privacy notice.